--* From postmaster%watson.vnet.ibm.com@yktvmv.watson.ibm.com  Sat Jun  5 22:12:07 1993
--* Received: from yktvmv2.watson.ibm.com by radical.watson.ibm.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/900524)
--*           id AA11819; Sat, 5 Jun 1993 22:12:07 -0400
--* X-External-Networks: yes
--* Received: from watson.vnet.ibm.com by yktvmv.watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
--*    with BSMTP id 8171; Sat, 05 Jun 93 22:12:45 EDT
--* Received: from YKTVMV by watson.vnet.ibm.com with "VAGENT.V1.0"
--*           id <A.SANTAS.NOTE.YKTVMV.2779.Jun.05.22:12:44.-0400>
--*           for asbugs@watson; Sat, 05 Jun 93 22:12:45 -0400
--* Received: from bernina.ethz.ch by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP;
--*    Sat, 05 Jun 93 22:12:44 EDT
--* Received: from neptune by bernina.ethz.ch with SMTP inbound id <15027-0@bernina.ethz.ch>; Sun, 6 Jun 1993 04:12:39 +0200
--* From: Philip Santas <santas@inf.ethz.ch>
--* Received: from rutishauser.inf.ethz.ch (rutishauser-gw.inf.ethz.ch) by neptune id AA01741; Sun, 6 Jun 93 04:12:34 +0200
--* Date: Sun, 6 Jun 93 04:12:32 +0200
--* Message-Id: <9306060212.AA21722@rutishauser.inf.ethz.ch>
--* Received: from ru7.inf.ethz.ch.rutishauser by rutishauser.inf.ethz.ch id AA21722; Sun, 6 Jun 93 04:12:33 +0200
--* To: asbugs@watson.ibm.com
--* Subject: unions
--* In-Reply-To: Mail from 'smwatt@watson.ibm.com (Stephen Watt)'
--*       dated: Sat, 5 Jun 1993 22:06:20 -0400
--* Cc: bronstein

--@ Fixed  by:  SSD   Wed Dec 08 11:41:49 1993 
--@ Tested by:  none 
--@ Summary:    Bug report does not exhibit a particular bug. 



Do the Unions work properly in the new version?
I'm interested in cases like:

Type1: with
    ...
  == add
      Rep ==> Union(c1: SI, c2: %, c3: Record(f1:String, f2:%))

Till now I get segmentation faults, but most of
my code relies on such constructs.

Philip