[Aldor-l] Testers

[Pippijn van Steenhoven]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:54:53PM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> How extensive are the changes? What are your goals in making these
> changes? Can you provide a brief roadmap? Are you moving towards a
> more autoconf compatible style of makefile?

Autoconf is a goal, yes, but I haven't done that, yet. Currently, my changes
involve only code. I want to make it easier to debug the compiler so bugs can
be found and fixed earlier.

> BTW, how do you plan to publish your changes? Would it make sense to
> create a branch in the Aldor SVN repository to allow you to post
> directly to the repository without affecting the current main branch
> (trunk)?

I'm not sure. The code as I have it locally, has changed quite a bit. I
changed some APIs and macro syntaxes as well as just about everything that
involves debugging. The differences between Aldor(local) and Aldor(svn) are
pretty large. I'll upload a source tarball and people can take a look at it.
Aldor.org administrators may then consider taking it (having royalty-free
rights to do so) and merging it with their own or making it into a branch.
We'll see :-)

-- 
Pippijn van Steenhoven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.aldor.org/pipermail/aldor-l_aldor.org/attachments/20071219/6685fd59/attachment-0002.bin>